To be Prime Minister, one must not only be titled the head of the federal government, but must have the skills and abilities to lead a country through politic and social conflicts in order to run a triumphant and democratic country. Mackenzie King was a superior prime minister because his peaceful choices had kept the nation united whilst increasingly altering Canada. He governed the country through socioeconomic changes, he led Canada through the Second World War with success and overall achieved much of the independence that Canada had gained during the 1930s and throughout his years in office. In contrast, even though R.B Bennett was a generous prime minister and put many suggestions in aid to solve Canada’s economic problems, his attempts to strengthen Canada’s economy had mostly failed. He also did not have the ability to delegate authority throughout the party and Cabinet and was ultimately unsuccessful when leading the Conservative party through the Great Depression.First, as a result of King’s approach to leadership when running the country, Canada was able to pull through many social and economic changes. For example, after winning the election in 1926, he took the opportunity of the late 1920’s to reduce war debt and introduce an old-age pension scheme. The Liberals did lose the 1930 election but fortunately missed the worst part of the Great Depression. In turn, Bennett won the 1930 election for promising aggressive combat against the Great Depression, which gained him the majority of the votes. However, once in office, Bennett found it difficult to develop a reasonable program. His attempt to coordinate welfare was also rejected by the provinces and his “New Deal” speech, which called for multiple social reforms such as health and unemployment insurance was not convincing enough for Canadians, resulting in a loss for the Conservatives in the 1935 elections. The Liberals and Mackenzie King were then reinstated in 1935 after using term “King or Chaos”, referring to the clash amongst the federal government and the communists known as the “On-to-Ottawa Trek” and resulting in the “Regina Riot”. R.B Bennett lost much of the country’s support and therefore lost the elections when he antagonized and arrested the leaders of the communist group that provoked the Regina Riot. He was an ineffective opposition leader until 1938, where he abandoned Canada and emigrated to England. Another example would be that although King did nothing to act against the Padlock Law, his style of compromising leadership resulted in minimal conflict within the country for French and English Canadians. Because of King’s ability to deal with conflict within the country and his aid with repaying debt, he was able to sustain peace within the land. In addition, Mackenzie King lead Canada through years of conflict during World War II from 1939 all the way to 1945. For instance, he had the ability to recognize the talents of his party members and filled his Cabinet with experienced men who supported him and as a result, had the ability to overcome the war with few faults. He did not wish for another war and stated that the Canadian Parliament would decide whether they would take part in helping Britain fight against Germany, nevertheless, he did indeed declare war on Germany. King carefully avoided the battles over conscription, patriotism and ethnicity that had divided Canada before and promised to French-Canadians that he would not inscribe conscription and gave a voluntary choice for enlistment where thousands of English-Canadians enrolled in the army to support the British; as a result, this kept the nation united, unlike the divisiveness during the first world war in 1917 when Robert Borden conscripted young men overseas. Another example was that Canadian government contributed much in effort to aid during the war such as contributing food supplies, financial aid, the British Commonwealth Air Training Plan (a procedure to direct Allied aircrews during war), weapons and armored vehicles as well as over a million Canadian troops to the Allied cause. Wartime production caused unemployment to reduce by a great deal; this industrial expansion generated financial arrangements to concur with the US. King had implemented unemployment insurance after the war for sickness, workers and family benefits in response to industrialization and citizens who feared that the Depression would happen again. His background in economics also allowed him to find policies that promised family allowances and health insurance. Not only did King help the British in a war that he did not want to fight, but he also expanded Canada’s industrial business and gave his citizen’s the reassurance that unemployment would not be another obstacle in their paths again. Finally, Mackenzie King was able to increase Canada’s independence while in office. For instance, he devoted to establish the definition of Dominion at the Imperial Conference in 1926 where he also demanded autonomy relations with the United Kingdom. Another example was when King used his friendship between the United State’s president, Franklin Roosevelt, to authorise funds in order for the British to be able to continue purchasing American goods. King was able to use influence the industrial relations between the US and Canada to work closely with each other on terms of defence and international trade’s that were fair and equal. One of Mackenzie King’s greatest accomplishments was that he kept the country united while still being able to satisfy the different needs and wants of each province and maintain a peaceful relationship with the United States, as well as establish Canada’s international reputation as an intermediate power that was fully committed to world order. Mackenzie King was portrayed as weird due to his supernatural beliefs and he also kept diaries where he wrote reflections and opinions about politics and people; King should not be criticized upon what he wrote in his journals but what he did to contribute to Canada’s history and the nation’s general accomplishments. Overall, Mackenzie King was a better prime minister because he progressively transformed Canada while making neutral decisions. This is proven because he governed Canada through multiple civil and financial changes, he lead the country through World War II with successful results and he also obtained a great amount of sovereignty for Canada. The way that Mackenzie King led Canada and the choices he made helped in discovering the the country’s identity as well as help shape what the country is today.